Teaching legal thinking to LLM students: Oral vs. written

SocratesAs I continue to work through the “multiple model answer approach” in my experiment with teaching legal writing to LLM students this semester (aka the banana peel/jogger question), I’ve also begun exposing the students to multiple recorded oral model answers for the same question. That is, I’ve recorded a number of native English speaking law students (or law school graduates) answering the the banana peel/jogger question.

I’ve incorporated the recordings by assigning the students one recording at a time for homework. The students are also provided with a transcript of the recording (typed by me) that they initially review for comprehension and also to try and identify the IRAC components. Then they are required to Continue reading →

Experiments in Teaching Legal Writing: Getting students to write more

morecowbellOne of the challenges I’ve noticed with my students’ writing is getting them to write in greater volume. I’m not sure if it’s a cultural issue, or simply the way these particular students learned about writing.

The issue has been particularly noticeable in the “Summary of the Day” activity. The students, in their summaries of the prior day’s class, inevitably include far less information and detail than I, as a reader in a higher education environment, would expect. And the same applies so far in their answers to the critical thinking question about the jogger who throws away the banana peel on the beach and whether that’s considered littering.

I think this happens in part because my students are from cultures that (as I understand it) tend to be less explicit. Or if it’s not a cultural issue in that sense, they’re definitely not familiar with the level of explicitness expected in American law school.

Regardless, the conclusion I’ve reached is Continue reading →

Lateness, apology letters and strict liability

I was having an issue with student lateness early in the semester, despite a lateness policy we discussed as a class the first week. Threats of a lower grade and of required meetings with program directors to discuss recurrent lateness seemed to have little effect. So one day, borrowing a concept I picked up from a parenting book, I presented the question to my students: What would be an appropriate consequence for lateness?

After some discussion (including input from me), we decided that an appropriate consequence would be: If you’re late for class, then you must Continue reading →

Newsela.com and the death of Justice Scalia

It’s in the news. It’s a great issue to discuss in class with LL.M. students. Supreme Court. Constitutional issues, checks and balances, strict constructionists, and more. But so much background knowledge is involved in discussing any aspect of Justice Scalia’s recent passing and all of its implications. Especially for students not fully familiar with U.S. law, politics, and culture.

One source I like to turn to in situations like this is Newsela.com which just published an article on Scalia’s passing. Newsela is a news site with articles from The Washington Post and Associated Press. However, Newsela takes each article and creates five graded versions of the article, i.e., at levels that are easier to read. This is a fantastic tool for differentiating instruction in the classroom. The students with stronger reading ability can read the highest or a higher version. And the students with weaker reading ability can read an easier version.

Or, if you really want to help them build background knowledge, vocabulary, and language awareness, have them read the easiest version first. Then a more difficult version. Once they have a basic comprehension from the easier version, they will have a better chance at inferring the meaning of more complex sentences and more sophisticated vocabulary that they encounter. Additionally, the two versions can be used to notice the language used to make sentences more complex, such as dependent clauses, compound predicates, noun phrases, and relative clauses.

I’ve tried this now a couple times with other articles from Newsela and among other things I found the students really appreciated having a sense of control over the topic and a chance to examine the language.

Plus, once you feel confident that all the students understand a topic such as Scalia’s death and the Constitutional implications, the rest of the class discussion tends to flow much better.

Using Legal Humor: Lawyer Joke Telling & Negotiation Activity

Using legal humor in class can be an extremely potent tool. It can also be a minefield as humor often does not travel well across cultures. When not well employed in a classroom, it can devolve into a painful over-explanation of a joke to blank and unsympathetic faces. (I speak from experience.)

But when done right, it can provide a high level of student engagement as well as unique opportunities for vocabulary improvement, language teaching, reading and speaking fluency, paraphrasing, and building of background knowledge and cultural awareness.

One activity that we like to use as Continue reading →

Creative use of the law school as a resource

Friendly faces for sure. But also a great resource for building legal background knowledge and English language communication skills.

One of the great things about running and teaching the American Law: Discourse & Analysis (ALDA) Program is that it operates completely within St. John’s Law School. And working within the law school means access to resources that can be used creatively to enhance legal learning and also build important background knowledge in engaging ways while developing a strong sense of connection with the school.

Here are a few examples I’ve used. It would be great to hear of examples from other law schools.

Noticing parentheses and quotation marks

hqdefaultI was a bit perplexed this past week when a student submitted an assignment as a Word file, and the name of the file included parentheses in an unexpected way. Like this:

StudentLastName-(Article Name)

My first impulse was to ignore it. My second impulse was to tell the student to remove the parentheses. But fortunately I curtailed those two instincts and followed my third instinct, which was Continue reading →